Insurance Captive for SPAC D&O Insurance? Nope.

Insurance captives are a great solution to the right problem. But are captives the solution to the problem of escalating prices for D&O insurance for SPAC IPOs? We tell you why captives and SPAC D&O insurance are a mismatch, and outline four ways SPACs can save money without forming a captive.

On April 13, 2021, join experts from several industries at a one-stop event for SPACs—hosted by Woodruff Sawyer and featuring Social Capital, PropTech, J.P. Morgan Chase, Ellenoff Grossman, Skadden, and Wachtel to discuss the state of the market, de-SPAC transactions, litigation and what the future holds for SPACs. More information can be found here. Hope you can join us.
—Priya Huskins

The financial environment behind the boom of SPAC IPOs

Insurance captives are a great solution to the right problem. A captive is a licensed insurance company that provides insurance for designated risks to its corporate parent company (essentially, creating your own insurance company) or third parties.

But are captives the solution to the problem of escalating prices for D&O insurance for SPAC IPOs, as some are suggesting?

The short answer is no, for all the reasons that I’ve outlined with my colleague, Evan Hessel, in: Should We Form a Captive for D&O Insurance? …and a few more, which I’ll discuss next.

When a Captive Makes Sense

As a general matter, captives make the most sense for high-frequency, low-severity, predictable claims that pay out over many years. Workers’ compensation claims are a good example; director and officer claims, on the other hand, are not. That is because D&O insurance claims are, by nature, low-frequency, high-severity events.

Remember, too, that the captive has to be funded. If a SPAC is challenged in having enough risk capital to purchase D&O insurance at the current rates, that SPAC will certainly not be able to fund a captive properly.

The upfront investment in captive formation and capitalization will likely be more than the cost of two years of D&O insurance. There is also the additional cost of regulatory compliance and possibly being required to add more capital to the captive over time.

In addition, the tax benefits that captives offer—a major reason to form an insurance captive—likely don’t apply here. Captives are particularly ill-suited for SPACs given the fact that SPACs don’t have operating profits against which they could deduct expenses (such as captive premiums) for a tax benefit.

Additionally, consider timing. Most SPACs are formed and go public in a very short period of time, at which point D&O insurance must be in place. There is unlikely to be enough time to form a captive.

Finally, not all aspects of D&O risk are suitable to be covered by a captive. Specifically, Side A risk would almost certainly need to be financed by commercial insurance, even if a captive is in place to cover the Side B and C D&O risk.

Remember that Side A responds in the case of claims in which a company is legally prohibited from indemnifying a director or officer, such as in the case of a derivative action settlement or corporate bankruptcy. If the captive is a wholly owned subsidiary of the parent company, as is the case for large corporate captives, it would likely suffer from the same inability to indemnify the directors and officers as the captive’s parent. So even if a SPAC forms a captive to underwrite the SPAC’s Side B and C risk, the SPAC would likely still need to purchase Side A-only coverage.

4 Ways SPACs Can Save Money

There are, of course, ways SPACs can save money on their D&O insurance that don’t involve forming a captive. In an article I wrote on how SPACs can save money on their D&O insurance premium, I outline four ways:

  1. Being comfortable with having almost no D&O insurance limit at the time of the IPO if the insurer can guarantee coverage for future claims after a de-SPAC transaction has closed.
  2. Placing a one-year policy instead of the standard two-year policy that most SPACs purchase to avoid paying for two years of coverage at the time of the SPAC IPO.
  3. Putting more premium in the tail policy and less in the initial SPAC IPO policy.
  4. Writing smaller layers with each insurer and taking a higher self-insured retention, or purchasing a Side A-only policy.

For more, see our Guide to D&O Insurance for SPAC IPOs.

SPAC IPO Guide Cover

Craving more information about what’s going on in the world of SPACs right now? Join us on April 13 for our SPAC Spring 2021 Update webinar. More information can be found, here.

Visit our SPACs industries page for more insights and resources related to Special Purpose Acquisition Companies.



Table of Contents