Search
Filter
-
How Employers Should Handle MLR Rebates 2014
For the third year, employers who sponsor an insured group health plan may be receiving a Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) rebate from their insurers. Self-funded medical benefit plans are not subject to these requirements. The rebates raise several fundamental questions for employers including:
- How much (if any) of the rebate must be distributed to plan participants?
- How quickly must I distribute the participants’ share?
- What options do I have in distributing the employees’ share?
- What are the tax consequences of the various distribution options that are available?
-
What the Latest Facebook Suit Could Mean for Director Pay
-
International P&C
International coverage for P&C related risks is largely about ensuring regulatory compliance, assuming the appropriate coverage is included in a master or global insurance program.
-
The Nasdaq Hack: How Russian Hackers Gained Entry to the Stock Market
-
FCPA, Instrumentality, and Supreme Court in Esquenazi
-
Great Expectations: When the SEC Wants Directors to Self-Report Wrongdoing
-
How Captives Can Play a Role in Controlling Employer Healthcare CostsHealthcare costs continue to be one of the largest expenses for companies. Their fully-insured medical carrier provides limited information about what’s driving up program premiums. They provide no effective cost control strategies and no real opportunity to fully benefit from their employees’ positive claims experience and wellness activities.View Insight
-
Halliburton: Not a win, but not a total loss for defendants either
-
Why Cyber Risk as a Boardroom Issue Can’t be Ignored
-
Why ‘Safe’ CEO Pay Formulas Can Lead to Generic Results
-
Final Rules: 90-Day Waiting Period and Orientation Period
Final regulations were released by the Departments of Labor (DOL), Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury (IRS) (The Departments) regarding the Affordable Care Act (ACA) 90-day waiting period rules, including the new one month “orientation period”, which may be imposed prior to the start of the waiting period.
-
What the Supreme Court Hobby Lobby Case Means to Employers
In a 5 to 4 decision the Supreme Court has ruled that certain privately held corporations do not have to comply with some of the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) contraception coverage requirements if they violate the owner’s religious views. The decision opens the door for companies that meet the IRS definition of a “closely held corporation” to opt-out of providing certain contraception coverage in their employer sponsored group health plan.